Estimating the Value of a Series
Most series can't be added up exactly, so you add the first terms and then put a fence around everything you left out, the remainder . Knowing how big the leftover can be is what turns an approximation into an answer you can trust.
What the symbols mean
- Remainder
The error s − sₙ: everything you didn't add.
- Positive decreasing function
The function behind the terms, with f(n) = aₙ.
What the symbols mean
- First omitted term
The size of the next term you didn't add.
What the symbols mean
- First omitted term
The next term after the ones you added.
- Ratio cap
A number below 1 that every later term-to-term ratio stays under.
Explanation
Estimating a series is simply adding up the first bunch of terms and then figuring out how far off you could be. The leftover part is called the remainder (it's what remains after you stop adding), and the whole game is putting an upper limit on it. That's useful because almost every series you meet in practice, like , has no nice closed-form answer, yet you still need a number. The equation is just three pieces: (the true total), (what you actually added up) and (everything you skipped). It looks like bookkeeping, and that's really all it is.
Every test in this unit answered a yes-or-no question: does it converge? This lesson asks the follow-up an engineer actually cares about: to what, and how close am I? The nice surprise is that the tests you already know come with error bounds built in. The work is in bounding .
Integral bound (positive, decreasing terms). The same rectangles as in the integral test squeeze the tail between two integrals. Add them to and you get an interval that contains , often a very tight one.
Comparison. If , the tail of is at most the tail of , which you may be able to compute (a geometric tail, for instance).
Alternating series. The error is at most the first omitted term, exactly as you saw in the alternating series lesson.
Ratio bound. If every ratio after stays at or below some , the tail is at most the geometric series . It's the ratio test's argument again, this time keeping track of the numbers.
A common mistake. It's tempting to think that once a series converges, a modest number of terms will get you close. Different series converge at wildly different speeds. Getting three decimals of takes a thousand terms; needs seven. Always check the bound instead of guessing.
See it
Worked examples
Estimate using , and bound the error.
- 1
Add the first ten terms: .
How many terms of guarantee an error below ?
- 1
For an alternating series the error is at most the first term you leave out, so you need , which means .
terms. This series converges slowly.
Practice
Type your answer and check it. Solve them all to complete the lesson.
Bound the error when is used to approximate , using .
How many terms of guarantee an error of at most ?
What error bound do you get using the first 5 terms of ?
How many terms of (starting from ) guarantee an error below ?
Using and the integral bounds from the example, estimate to three decimals.
The Stefan–Boltzmann law of thermal radiation involves . If you add the first terms, the rest is at most . What's the smallest that guarantees an error below ?
The hardest one here. Get it, and you've got this lesson.
Using only the first terms of plus integral bounds on the rest, estimate the sum as the midpoint of the interval .
Where it's used
Scientific libraries compute functions like and the error function by summing series until a remainder bound falls below machine precision. The bounds in this lesson are what tell the code when to stop.